HTwork.ca Classifieds Vacations

Archives    
 


Some federal Conservatives now jumpy about prorogation backlash

Some GTA and Quebec Tories recently expressed concern in caucus meetings about Parliament's shutdown, but the Libs shouldn't pull the trigger just yet.
Published February 8, 2010    5 Comments



TORONTO—Public opinion polls, as we all know, go up and down and in the last few years have been more volatile than feathers in the wind, as Giuseppe Verdi put it in the Rigoletto. Still, the last slump of the Conservatives has created some turmoil within Prime Minister Stephen Harper's minority governing caucus and some excitement within Liberal ranks.

Despite that the decision to prorogue Parliament was initially welcomed by most of the Conservative caucus members, there is now a lingering disappointment with the decision. Some are trying to blame the Prime Minister and the PMO.

These feelings, gently, but openly emerged during the GTA and Quebec Conservatives' caucus meetings held in the last few weeks.

Some Conservative MPs, even if not against the decision to prorogue Parliament, were not happy with the PMO's communications plan, or lack of one, to explain to Canadians the reasons for the prorogation.

I'm sure that, by now, they have realized that the decision was not in the best interests of the government, and/or its execution was faulty. Still, they believe that it's too late to go back for two reasons. They don't want Canadians to think the Prime Minister is a weak leader who changes his views with the polls and the Throne Speech is not ready.

At the same time, some Liberals are encouraged by the changes and are taking a big breath of relief, knowing that Prime Minister Harper won't provoke an election this spring. There are some Liberals who are so encouraged by this change in the mood of the electorate that they are seriously considering the possibility of bringing down the government after the presentation of the next budget.

Of course this kind of action is, for now, vehemently disputed by many Liberal strategists. First because they know that the mood of the electorate changes very often and what is true today is not necessarily true in a couple weeks.

The second reason is the one that concerns the Liberals the most. The changes in the voting preferences of the electorate have little to do with the Liberal Party and much less with its leader Michael Ignatieff. The whole issue is about the government and Harper and this can change in the next few weeks after the Olympics and, mainly, after the March budget.

The Ekos poll last week put the Liberals at 31.9 per cent and the Tories at 31 per cent, which is well within the margin of error. The same poll put the NDP at 15.4 per cent, the Bloc Québécois at 8.4 per cent, and the Green Party at 10.9 per cent. Those numbers would give the Liberals the possibility of forming a minority government, but this is like Ignatieff betting his political future on the 6/49. The jury on his leadership credibility is still out and the doubts about his performance during a very tough and long campaign have not been tested yet.

Furthermore, the Liberals have already tried to bring the government down last fall, but their action failed miserably because the other two opposition parties didn't bite and supported the government. To go to the polls, the Liberals need something more consistent in electoral support, and if they get it, it will not come from the Conservatives, but most likely from the Bloc Québécois in Quebec and the NDP in the rest of the country.

If that happens, I'm not sure that the other two parties are eager to switch from a Harper minority government to one led by Ignatieff, the same guy who killed the coalition of 2008 between the three opposition parties.

It would be politically wise for the Liberals to work hard to rebuild the party, the policies and the leader, before gambling on their future and that of the country.

Unfortunately, they have tried once and they could try again. For some in the Liberal Party going back to power is everything and, it also might be that losing again to another minority Conservative government will give them the opportunity to get rid of Ignatieff which would be seen by some Liberals as a victory in itself.

Angelo Persichilli is political editor of Corriere Canadese, Canada's Italian newspaper based in Toronto.

news@hilltimes.com

The Hill Times

  |  

Story Comments (5)

02/08/10 at 09:02 pm

By gar
The polls as most like to say is only a snapshot in time.Outside of the beltway and the screams on all the blogs by the left with the help of the media not much has changed.Iffy has a long way to go before he can overcome that academic elitist snob that most feel about him.A staunch Liberal friend of mine made me laugh when he said "there is something about that guy scares me he has a hidden agenda" I was about to do battle as a Conservative until I realized he was talking about Iffy and he was no joking.The Whiz Is trying to win with yesterdays news.To the average Canadian the abortion issue is a non starter.As for this detainee thing it will take one hell of a lot for the Liberals to convince Canadians that either our government or troops had any great involvement.They are playing a dangerous game with 2 million veterans still living in this country .As one the ones I talk to consider the Liberals and the NDP trying to force secrets of the military open to them that may lead to more Canadian deaths is sacrilegious to say the least even if there was some vicarious evidence on our troops part.Those who have never experienced a fire fight will never know the extremes of one emotions.If this continues when parliament resumes with the same line of demands by the opposition you will see the polls suddenly shift back to the Tories.Media reporters in the beltway take note!
02/08/10 at 02:02 pm

By Peter Neilson
Given that, six weeks ago, most Canadians couldn't spell, pronounce, or define "prorogation", I believe this whole "issue" is a mile wide, and about an inch deep. Once an election is called, it will be gone like dry leaves in the wind, and real issues - the economy, jobs, and leadership will define the election. In my work, dealing with many members of the public every single day, I have not had one single person - not one - spontaneously bring up the prorogation issue. As for those polls - once the issue is explained (as it must be) of course most people are "upset", but because it has to be explained - in my books, it is a non- issue. Liberals will force an election at their peril, and if I were Harper, I would salivate at the thought.
02/08/10 at 12:02 pm

By Gabby in QC
"... his whole mission is to demean Liberals.
You are JUST an opinion writer who shouldn't be taken seriously."

Isn't that YOUR opinion? Are you being completely objective?

Perhaps you've forgotten this poem studied in high school, Lord Tennyson's "Ulysses":
"I am a part of all that I have met ..."
I believe that means all our experiences colour our perceptions, our judgment, our way of looking at things.

Show me a person with no philosophical, socio-political or whatever POV, and I'll show you an empty head.
02/08/10 at 08:02 am

By Sandra G.
I find it rather silly that this writer thinks Liberals should take HIS advice, considering his whole mission is to demean Liberals.

You are JUST an opinion writer who shouldn't be taken seriously. In fact, no "partisan" writer, left or right should be taken seriously.

They just don't have the ability to look at things objectively.

Canadians need "non-partisan" writers.
02/07/10 at 12:02 pm

By Gabby in QC
Would the opposition actually agree to bring down the government in the spring? As was pointed by Greg Weston in a column some time ago, a large number of MPs are waiting to become eligible for their MP's pension in June.

By that time, the opposition parties would already have voted on the budget, wouldn't they?

All that this speculation about election timing confirms, unfortunately, is that political parties, especially when in opposition, may piously state they're looking out for Canada's interests, but in actual fact, they're merely looking out for their own party's fortunes.

Make a Comment

You must be a subscriber or a registered member to make a comment.
OPTION 1
Subscriber Login
Forget your password?
Email   Password
OPTION 2
Subscribe to The Hill Times
Subscribe to the print and electronic editions and get instant access to The Hill Times online.

Political Reporting

Tom Korski
CBC displays keen sense of self-preservation

Inside Politics

Chantal Hébert
You call that recalibration?


















© 2010 The Hill Times Publishing Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.